Breaking
EU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the NetherlandsEU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the Netherlands
Tuesday, 20 May 2026  ·  Ljouwert, FryslânEst. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

Nijs fan de Wrâld  ·  World News  ·  Frisian Perspective

The Science of Why People Believe False Things
World

The Science of Why People Believe False Things

July 15, 2025 · Frisian News

Researchers find that people cling to false beliefs because of how the human brain processes information, not because they lack intelligence. Understanding these mental patterns matters for both individuals and society.

English

A man in Ohio spent five years convinced that a major political figure had faked his death. He collected videos, documents, and testimonies that all pointed to his belief. When researchers showed him clear proof otherwise, he did not change his mind. This was not stupidity. His brain simply stored the false idea first, and correction felt like an attack.

Psychologists call this the backfire effect. Once someone plants a belief in your head, your brain treats it like old furniture. It does not want to throw it out. When new facts arrive that contradict the belief, the brain resists. It questions the source, finds reasons to doubt, or simply ignores the information. The stronger the original belief, the stronger the resistance grows.

But belief formation goes deeper than stubbornness. The brain builds patterns from whatever it sees first. If a person hears a false claim repeated ten times, the brain records it as familiar, and familiar feels true. News outlets, social media algorithms, and family members all reinforce certain stories. Once embedded, these beliefs shape how a person filters all future information. Facts that fit the belief stick. Facts that contradict it bounce off.

Institutions made this worse. School systems taught people to trust authority figures without question. News organizations lost their credibility long ago through bias and poor editing. Governments lied about wars, health, and money. Now people do not know whom to trust, so they trust their gut and their tribe instead. Small communities used to police false beliefs through reputation and direct knowledge. Now millions of strangers online reinforce whatever story fits your anger or fear.

None of this means people cannot change their minds. They do, but slowly. Change happens when someone they trust brings the new idea, when the old belief causes them real harm, or when they see the contradiction with their own eyes. Shouting facts at a believer hardens their position. Building a relationship and asking questions works better. The fight against false belief is not about winning arguments. It is about helping people rebuild how they think.

✦ Frysk

In man yn Ohio wie fyf jier lang oertsjûge dat in grutte politike figuer syn doed fervalst hie. Hy sammele fideo's, dokuminten en tsjûchenis dy't syn oertsjûging stypet. Doe ûndersykers him dúdlik tsjinbewiis toanden, feroare hy syn betinken net. Dit wie gjin domheid. Syn brein hie it leager idee earst opslein, en korreksje fielde as in oanfal.

Psykologen neame dit it backfire effect. Ien kear in oertsjûging yn jo holle plant, behanelet jo brein it as alde meubels. It wol it net weggje. As nije feiten komme dy't de oertsjûging tsjinsprekelje, werset it brein. It twivelje de boarne, fynt redenen om te twiveljen, of ignorearje de ynformaasje gewoan. Hoe sterker de orizjinele oertsjûging, hoe sterker de wearstân groeit.

Mar oertsjûgingsformaasje giet djipper as ei-eigenzinnichheid. It brein bouwt patronen út wat it earst sjocht. As immen in leager bewearing tsien kear hoart, registrearje it brein it as fertroud, en fertroud fielet wier. Nijsomedia, sosjale media-algoritmes en famyljeleden fersterke bepaalde ferhalen allegear. Ien kear ynburgere, foarmje dizze oertsjûgingen hoe in persoan alle takomstige ynformaasje filtret. Feiten dy't by de oertsjûging passe, bliuwe stekke. Feiten dy't tsjinyn gean, keatse ôf.

Jnstellings makken dit earger. Skoalstelsels learden minsken autowriteiten sûnder fragen te fertrouwen. Nijsomedia ferlearen har gelowwerdichheid lang lyn troch foarynhêlding en slechtere redaksje. Regearings leagy oer kriegen, sûnens en jild. No witte minsken net mear wa't te fertrouwen, dus fertrouwe se harren pânsefel en harren stam. Lytse mienskippen kontrolearren leage oertsjûgingen oait troch reputaasje en direkte kennis. No fersterke miljenen frjemmen online wat voor ferhaal jo ek oanslute by jo wrate of eangst.

Dit betsjuttet net dat minsken net fan betinken ferskaatsje kinne. Dat dogge se, mar stadich. Ferskling bart as immen dy't jo fertrouwe it nije idee bringt, as de alde oertsjûging jo echte skea opliuwert, of as jo de tsjinspraak mei jo eigen eagen sjogge. Feiten nei in geloavige skeaun ferheikje harren posysje. In relaasje opbouwe en fragen stelle wurket better. De strijd tsjin leager gelûf giet net oer it winnen fan arguminten. It giet der om minsken te helpen opnij te learen tinke.


Published July 15, 2025 · Frisian News · Ljouwert, Fryslân