Breaking
EU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the NetherlandsEU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the Netherlands
Tuesday, 20 May 2026  ·  Ljouwert, FryslânEst. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

Nijs fan de Wrâld  ·  World News  ·  Frisian Perspective

The Science of Soil Health and Why Modern Farming Ignores It
Agriculture

De wittenskip fan boaiemsûnens en wêrom't modern buorkjen it negearret

July 27, 2025 · Frisian News

Research shows healthy soil holds more carbon, water, and nutrients, yet industrial agriculture treats it as inert dirt. Farmers who rebuild soil see better yields and lower input costs, but government subsidies reward the opposite approach.

Frisian flagFrysk

In hânfol grûn út in sûn fjild befettet mear libbene organismen as minsken op ierde rinne. Baktearjes, skimmels, nematoaden en geleedpoatigen foarmje netwurken dy't organysk materiaal ôfbrekke, stikstof bine en wetter fêsthâlde wêr't plantewoartels it berikke kinne. Dochs sterilisearje de measte yndustriële pleaten harren grûn mei gemyske inputs en bewurking, en deadzje se it libben dat gewaaksen groeie lit. De wittenskip is desennia âld. It probleem is dat wynstmarges en regearringsbelied de oare kant op wize.

Europeesk undersyk fan de ôfrûne fiif jier befêstiget wat boeren yn regeneratyfe systemen al wisten: koalstofrike boaiem absorbearet mear rein, erodearret minder, fereasket minder inputs en slacht mear fiedingsstoffen op. In stúdzje fan de Universiteit fan Wageningen fûn dat boaiem mei in hege mikrobiële ferskaat 20 prosint hegere opbringsten produsearre ûnder stressomstannichheden lykas drûchte. In oare toande oan dat it weropbouwen fan boaiembiologyske prosessen de behoefte oan stikstofmêststoffen binnen fjouwer jier mei in tredde ferlege. Dit binne gjin marginale winsten. It binne ekonomyske feroarings dy't lânbouregy's op eigen risiko negerje.

Mar it Europeeske subsydzjesysteem beloannet it tsjinoerstelde. Betellingen út it Mienskiplik Lânboubelied streame foaral nei lâneigeners dy't gewaaksen ferbouwe op platte, ferienfâldige fjilden. In boer dy't grûn weropbout sjocht gjin jild foar dat wurk oant de opbringsten ferbetterje, soms jierren letter. Underwilens ûntfangt in buorman dy't keunstmjittige stikstof dumpet rjochtstreekse betellingen per hektare, sûnder fragen. De prikkelstruktuer slút boeren fêst yn degradaasje. Jongere boeren, dy't oars grûn op erfde lân weropbouwe soene, ferkeapje oan gruttere operaasjes om't se net fiif jier wachtsje kinne om fan harren eigen ferbettering te profitearjen.

De fiedselyndustry draacht ek skuld. Supermerken easkje goedkeape, uniforme produkten en wize alles ôf dat mear kostet om te ferbouwen of der oars útsjocht. Graanhannelaars priisje granen itselde, nettsjinsteande boaiemkoalstof of mikrobiële sûnens. Gjin merkbeleanning bestiet foar de boer dy't jierren besteedt oan it weropbouwen fan fruchtberheid. Banken sille boaiemferbettering net finansierje om't accountants gjin sekerheden sjogge yn ûnsichtbere biologyske prosessen. De hiele keten, fan belied oant ferkeap, berekkenet wearde sûnder rekken te hâlden mei wat boaiemsûnens werklik produsearret.

Lytse feroarings barre op guon plakken. Guon boeren yn Nederlân, Frankryk en Denemark fiere wynstjaande bedriuwen op regenerearre grûn mei legere kosten. Se ferkeapje oan direkte klanten, restaurants en fiedselferwerkers dy't ree binne foar echte kwaliteit te beteljen. Dizze bedriuwen groeie nettsjinsteande it systeem, net dertroch. As Europa himsels fiede wol sûnder stikstof út fossile brânstof yn te fieren, of it ferlies fan boppegrûn troch erosy foarkomme wol, moat it de prikkels omdraaje. Dat fereasket konfrontaasje mei elke ynstelling dy't profitearret fan boaiemdea.

English

A handful of soil from a healthy field contains more living organisms than humans walk the earth. Bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and arthropods form networks that break down organic matter, fix nitrogen, and hold water where plant roots can reach it. Yet most industrial farms sterilize their soil with chemical inputs and tillage, killing the very life that makes crops grow. The science is decades old. The problem is profit margins and government policy point the other way.

European research from the past five years confirms what farmers in regenerative systems already knew: carbon-rich soil absorbs more rainfall, erodes less, requires fewer inputs, and stores more nutrients. A study by the University of Wageningen found that soils with high microbial diversity produced 20 percent higher yields under stress conditions like drought. Another showed that rebuilding soil biology cut nitrogen fertilizer needs by a third within four years. These are not marginal gains. They are economy-changing numbers that farming regions ignore at their peril.

But Europe's subsidy system rewards the opposite. Common Agricultural Policy payments flow mostly to landowners who grow commodity crops on flat, simplified fields. A farmer rebuilding soil does not see cash for that work until yields improve, sometimes years later. Meanwhile, a neighbor dumping artificial nitrogen receives direct payments per hectare, no questions asked. The incentive structure locks farmers into degradation. Younger farmers, who might otherwise rebuild soil on inherited land, sell to larger operations because they cannot wait five years to profit from their own improvement.

The food industry bears some blame too. Supermarkets demand cheap, uniform products and reject anything that costs more to grow or looks slightly different. Grain traders price commodity wheat the same regardless of soil carbon or microbial health. No market reward exists for the farmer who spends years rebuilding fertility. Banks will not finance soil improvement because accountants see no collateral in invisible biology. The whole chain, from policy to retail, calculates value without counting what soil health actually produces.

Small changes are happening in pockets. Some farmers in the Netherlands, France, and Denmark run profitable operations on regenerated soil with lower costs. They sell to direct customers, restaurants, and food processors willing to pay for genuine quality. These operations grow despite the system, not because of it. If Europe wants to feed itself without importing nitrogen from fossil fuels, or losing topsoil to erosion, it will need to reverse the incentives. That requires confronting every institution that profits from soil death.


Published July 27, 2025 · Frisian News · Ljouwert, Fryslân