Breaking
EU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the NetherlandsEU Commission issues new nitrogen compliance ultimatumFrisian farmers vow to resist Brussels directiveNew fierljeppen record set in WinsumWetterskip Fryslân warns of coastal flooding riskLeeuwarden named top cycling city in the Netherlands
Tuesday, 20 May 2026  ·  Ljouwert, FryslânEst. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

Nijs fan de Wrâld  ·  World News  ·  Frisian Perspective

Why the 40-Hour Work Week Is an Anachronism That Will Not Die
Economy

Why the 40-Hour Work Week Is an Anachronism That Will Not Die

April 5, 2025 · Frisian News

The 40-hour work week, born from 1930s factory labor, persists despite automation and changing work patterns. Employers cling to it for control, not productivity.

English

A factory manager in Detroit, 1938, watched workers punch time clocks at 8 a.m. sharp. Henry Ford and labor unions had struck a bargain: a 40-hour week for five days, Monday through Friday. That number stuck. It stuck in law, in contract templates, in the minds of everyone who manages people. Eighty-seven years later, most of the world still measures work by the hour, despite the fact that knowledge work bears almost nothing in common with assembly-line production.

Automation has eliminated millions of repetitive jobs, yet the clock hour remains sacred. A software engineer who writes three lines of code that save her company thousands of dollars works the same 40 hours as a colleague who spends a week debugging a minor issue. A consultant who solves a client's problem in two hours still blocks out eight. Time imprisonment, not output, governs the modern workplace. The metric is broken, but it endures because institutions resist change, and because managers trust hours more than they trust people.

Companies claim they cannot measure knowledge work fairly, so they measure time instead. This is a lie they tell themselves. They measure it because presence in an office, an email at 9 p.m., or a filled calendar proves obedience. The 40-hour week became a tool of control long ago. Remote work threatened that control, so employers fought it hard and now drag workers back to buildings. The hours stayed the same. Productivity rarely improved. Burnout rose.

Some nations have experimented with shorter weeks. Iceland tested 32 hours and found workers did the same work in less time. Iceland then abandoned the experiment anyway, because productivity gains do not matter as much as the appearance of labor. Even when the data arrives clear and simple, institutions find reasons to ignore it. The economic system rewards compliance over results, busyness over benefit.

Until companies stop measuring work by time and start measuring it by what actually gets done, the 40-hour week will remain. It will survive longer than it deserves because it serves the manager and the boss. The worker suffers, but the worker rarely decides.

✦ Frysk

In fabryksmanager yn Detroit, 1938, seach wurkers om 8 oere 's morns har stempelkaartsjes yn de klok drukke. Henry Ford en fakbûnsen hiene in deal sletten: in 40-urige wike foar fiif dagen, moandei oant freed. Dat getal bleau hingjen. It bleau hingjen yn 'e wet, yn kontraktsjablonen, yn 't sin fan elkenien dy't minsken oanstjoert. Sânentachtich jier letter mjit de measte wrâld it wurk noch altyd yn oeren, ûndanks it feit dat kennisarbeid hast neat gemien hat mei produksje oan 'e loopand.

Automatisearring hat miljarden repetitive banen fuortsmiten, mar it klokuer bliuwt hielch. In softwareûntwikkelaar dy't trije rigels kode skriuwt dy't har bedriuw tûzenen euro's besparret, wurket deselde 40 oeren as in kollega dy't in wike oan in lyts probleem debug. In konsultant dy't it probleem fan in klant yn twa oer oplost, blokkeart noch altyd acht oer. Tiidsgefangenis, net opbringst, regeert 'e moderne wurkplak. De maatstef is bûten, mar hy bliuwt bestean om't ynstellings feroaring tsjinsteane, en om't leiders oeren mear fertruwe dan se minsken fertruwe.

Bedriuwen stelle dat se kennisarbeid net earlik mjitte kinne, dus mjitte se tiid. Dit is in leage dy't se harsels fertelle. Se mjitte it om't oanwêzigheid yn in kantoor, in e-mail om 21 oere, of in follantsje kalinder gehursum bewiist. De 40-urige wike waard lang lyn in kontrolemiddel. Thús wurkje bedrige dy kontrole, dus wurkjouwers fochen hurd oan en sleane no wurkers werom nei gebouwen. De oeren bleau itselde. Produktiviteit ferbettere selden. Útputting steeg.

Some lannen hawwe koartere wiken test. Ysland test 32 oer en ûntdike dat wurkers deselde wurk yn minder tiid diene. Ysland gief it eksperimint dochs op, om't produktiviteitwinsten net sa folle betsjutte as it uterlik fan arbeid. Sels as de gegevens dúdlik en ienfâldich komme, fine ynstellings redenen om se te negearjen. It ekonomyske systeem beleanet gehorsum boppe resultaten, druk boppe foardiel.

Oant bedriuwen stoppe mei it mjitte fan wurk yn tiid en begjinne it te mjitte neffens wat eins dien wurde, sil de 40-urige wike bliuwe. It sil langer bestean dan it fertsjinnet om't it de manager en 'e baas tsjinnet. De wurker lidt, mar de wurker bepaalt selden.


Published April 5, 2025 · Frisian News · Ljouwert, Fryslân